Diet Weight Loss / / August 12, 2017
erroneously whether the theory about calories?
Montignac believes that the theory of calories has long been discredited.Firstly, it is absolutely incomprehensible method of counting calories in a given product.That is a direct connection between the mass of the product (such as fat) and calories that it can form in the body simply does not exist.Slight differences in the structure of matter, almost no influence on its weight, can significantly alter the caloric.The assertion that 1 gram of fat gives you so many calories, initially false, since it is unknown the structure of fat.Liquid vegetable oils vary in caloric solid from animal by 20-30%.This hypothesis was put forward more than 100 years ago, and then adjusted by the authors themselves.But their tentative justification in their inaccuracies went beyond the official nutrition.Then the idea of metabolism were still insufficient.Sometimes it happens - error was recognized truth, and attempts to correct it go unnoticed.
Secondly, one sausage varieties, cooked by different manufacturers, will certainly have different compositions and vary in caloric content.And even on the same plant composition sausage will vary from batch to batch.However, no one ignores.Or take the fish.They write that 100 g of such a fish give X calories.So the value of X will depend on not only the type of fish, but on the place and time of harvest.But this information is also not a buyer.Therefore indicated on the label the number of calories is very far from the truth.
Third, there is the famous "American paradox".Its essence is that the calories consumed in the United States over the past 10 years decreased, while the number of obese people has increased.
agree 100%, and can only be clarified.Proteins one mass but different amino acid composition may not give the same amount of energy.Their components - amino acids - in vitro burn the same, and behave differently in the body.For example, amino acids such as tryptophan, generally does not dissolve in the body to produce energy.In addition, without getting into the "wilds" of biochemistry, we say that our body is like a solicitous hostess.If she has a lot of money, she can afford to buy refined products in the supermarket, but the money certainly will keep "just in case", and if small, then go to the wholesale market and buy that easier, but the "nest egg" will still leave.So the body: as if we did not limit, it will still endeavor to deposit reserves.
Counting calories can lead to ortoreksii
From the history only of our country, you can bring hundreds of thousands of examples of people who lived in this meager food intake, according to all the laws of "calorie" diets wereto die.Counting calories is not more than a convention that allows a few to restrain his appetite, but the constant arithmetic deprives a person of the same, but it is very important the joy of life - the enjoyment of food.This is often the cause of depression.Such a person is always concerned about the numbers, and, torn, feels guilty.Constant stress caused by fear bust calories or conventional units along the famous Kremlin diet, accompanied by an increased secretion of adrenal hormones, resulting in immunosuppression.Hence, various diseases associated with immune deficiency.You know, what is called the "disease of tears"?Cancer genitals.So "dietosidenie" not as harmless as it seems.It is necessary not only to limit yourself as learn to enjoy other foods and of other amounts.
purer the product, so it is more harmful?
Michel Montignac believes that, before undertaking the food restrictions, you must go through 3 learning stages.The first - to analyze their eating behavior and eating habits, critically evaluating them.Second - remember the school curriculum, and the physiology of digestion and metabolism bases.The third - to find out the specific composition of food consumed.From his point of view, the scourge of modern civilization is excess refining products.Perfectly owning statistics, he argues that in countries such as India, obesity is developed in parallel with the replacement of local varieties of rice unproductive fodder for modern high-yielding.
With allegations of the French nutritionist is hard to disagree.Before you expose your body risky experiments Bragg, Shatalov, Bolotov and other "experts" it is good to begin to understand a little bit in its own device, remembering the school curriculum.The problem is that there is no doctor who would try to create a new field theory, or to discover something new in the strength of materials.But the former radio engineers, mechanics and builders that would provide medical and nutritional recommendations, a dime a dozen.And if you, for example, saw in the text that the fructose in the intestines can turn into glucose, and therefore harmful, or that carbohydrates undergo fermentation in the stomach, put the literature.Authors her "not in the subject."
As for the purification (refining), food, give an example, an unknown Montignac.South African doctors note that the local population is several times less than the white, suffering from cardiovascular diseases.A closer analysis shows that the local elite is sick as often as white.The reason was as bread.The flour finely ground, not available to the general population, but consumes the elite, not a antistenokardichesky factor.Therefore, the elite is sick, and the poor do not.
Food should be rich in dietary fiber?
addition to carbohydrates include glucose and many other substances.Primarily - dietary fiber.This is undoubtedly a "good" carbohydrates.By Montignac, carbohydrates quality depends on their bioavailability, and it, in turn, - the presence in foods of dietary fiber.The more, the less availability of carbohydrates.If you take a number of potatoes and carrots, which would contain the same amount of carbohydrates, the hyperglycemia caused by a carrot, would be substantially lower, as thanks to the availability of a significant amount of fiber carbohydrates carrots roughly half that of the potato.
This view is supported by two arms Montignac.Unfortunately, the role of fiber is clearly underestimated.Such giperglikemichnye diets are notorious "Luzhkov" or the "Kremlin" is simply criminal.
In these diets vegetables and fruits so expensive "cost" that our great compatriot stop eating them, depriving themselves of vitamins and dietary fiber.As a result, young ladies face constipation (broken formation of feces) and, subsequently, hemorrhoids;accelerated sklerotizirovanie vessels (broken excretion of cholesterol), difficulty in removing toxins food (dietary fibers act as enterosorbents).
As for hypovitaminosis, the girl sitting on these diets, it is necessary to take vitamins in pill form.
But to build in fiber is also not absolute.Recently, one American scholar wrote in his article that a teaspoon of pectin (a type of fiber), it suffices to remove the sclerotic plaques.All is good, but the thing - pectins are not absorbed into the bloodstream.They absorb cholesterol, but in the intestine and remove plaque in the blood vessels can not in any way.
Trying and sweet to eat, and keep waist, ladies start to use sugar substitutes.Montignac their opponent.In his opinion, it is better to learn to enjoy the tastes of others.But if you really really want, occasionally consume foods with fructose.Good substitute for sweets without sugar, natural jams.
large-scale study of almost all sugar substitutes showed that most of them should be avoided.A good sweetener - aspartame, but it absolutely can not use pregnancy as the fetus can be broken point of phenylalanine (a common occurrence), which is part of the substitute.Furthermore, aspartame, forms toxic products when heated.It does not know everything, so there have been severe poisoning.The most harmless drugs from stevia, but they are not very standardized.In general, if a compelling desire, then fructose.It is a natural product of glucose metabolism in the body, are not able to cause any harm.
way, lipids (fats), too, are "bad" and "good.""Good" (in which we are in agreement Montignac) - liquid vegetable oils and fish oils.We had read that the vegetable oil - a "drying oil", that they are harmful and cause obesity.Nonsense.
same vegetable oil converted into margarine, so changing its structure, it becomes poison.Useful margarine does not happen.They differ only in the degree of hazard.Their only advantage - the absence of cholesterol, which he has never happened in vegetable oil.Therefore, when you see the label on the bottle with oil: "No cholesterol" can laugh with us.
fats of fish contain these fatty acids that are not found in other products.So eat fish at your leisure.Whatever she was not fat, this fat is not going to.Vice versa.But to drink cod liver oil is not worth it, because you might accidentally get an excess of vitamins A and D, which is dangerous.